دوره 18، شماره 2 - ( 4-1402 )                   جلد 18 شماره 2 صفحات 23-9 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها

XML English Abstract Print

رابطه بین ویژگی‌های شخصیتی با رفتار فابینگ در دانشجویان: نقش واسطه‌ای اعتیاد به گوشی‌های هوشمند
محمد مهدی اکبرزاده1 ، سعید ایمانی*2 ، شهریار شهیدی1
1- دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
2- دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران ، s_imani@sbu.ac.ir
چکیده:   (3711 مشاهده)
براساس ادبیات پژوهشی، کاهش کیفیت روابط دوستانه، پیشرفت تحصیلی پائین و اهمال‌کاری می‌تواند از اثرات منفی رفتار فابینگ در دانشجویان باشد. بنابراین، پژوهش حاضر با هدف تعیین نقش واسطه‌ای اعتیاد به گوشی‌های هوشمند در رابطه بین ویژگی‌های شخصیتی و رفتار فابینگ در دانشجویان انجام شد. در قالب یک طرح توصیفی ـ همبستگی از نوع مدل معادلات ساختاری، تعداد 615 نفر (334 زن، 281 مرد) از دانشجویان دانشگاه‌های شهر تهران به روش نمونه‌گیری دردسترس انتخاب شدند و به پرسشنامه‌های ویژگی‌های شخصیتی نئو (فرم 60 سوالی)، پرسشنامه استاندارد اعتیاد به گوشی‌های هوشمند و مقیاس عمومی رفتار فابینگ به شکل آنلاین پاسخ دادند. نتایج مطالعه نشان داد ویژگی شخصیتی برون‌گرایی با میزان رفتار فابینگ رابطه منفی و معنی‌دار دارد.  هم‌چنین ویژگی‌های شخصیتی روان‌رنجوری و برون‌گرایی با اعتیاد به گوشی‌های هوشمند رابطه مثبت و معنی‌دار و ویژگی‌های شخصیتی میزان توافق‌پذیری و وجدانی بودن با اعتیاد به گوشی‌های هوشمند رابطه منفی و معنی‌دار داشتند. متغیر اعتیاد به گوشی‌های هوشمند در رابطه بین ویژگی‌های شخصیتی روان‌رنجوری، برون‌گرایی، توافق‌پذیری و وجدانی‌بودن با رفتار فابینگ در دانشجویان نقش واسطه‌ای داشت. به نظر می‌رسد در محیط‌های درمانی می‌توان با مداخله بر روی عوامل خطر و اعتیاد به گوشی‌های هوشمند، میزان رفتار فابینگ در دانشجویان را بهبود بخشید.
واژه‌های کلیدی: ویژگی‌های شخصیتی، فابینگ، اعتیاد به گوشی‌های هوشمند، دانشجویان
متن کامل [PDF 907 kb]   (75 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: تخصصي
دریافت: 1403/3/2 | ویرایش نهایی: 1403/5/20 | پذیرش: 1403/5/25 | انتشار الکترونیک پیش از انتشار نهایی: 1403/5/27 | انتشار: 1404/4/22
فهرست منابع
1. Abi Doumit, C., Malaeb, D., Akel, M., Salameh, P., Obeid, S., & Hallit, S. (2023). Association between Personality Traits and Phubbing: The Co-Moderating Roles of Boredom and Loneliness. In Healthcare, 11(6), 915. [DOI:10.3390/healthcare11060915] [PMID] []
2. Afdal, A., Alizamar, A., Ifdil, I., Sukmawati, I., Zikra, Z., Asmidir, I., ... & Haryani, H. (2019). An Analysis of Phubbing Behavior: Preliminary research from counseling perspective. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 295, 270-273. [DOI:10.2991/icetep-18.2019.65]
3. Alsubaie, M. M., Stain, H. J., Webster, L. A. D., & Wadman, R. (2019). The role of sources of social support on depression and quality of life for university students. International journal of adolescence and youth, 24(4), 484-496. [DOI:10.1080/02673843.2019.1568887]
4. Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Gjertsen, S. R., Krossbakken, E., Kvam, S., & Pallesen, S. (2013). The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of behavioral addictions, 2(2),90-99. [DOI:10.1556/JBA.2.2013.003] [PMID]
5. Ang, M. P., Chong, Y. X., & Lau, P. J. (2019). The impact of loneliness and fear of missing out in predicting phubbing behaviour among undergraduates in Malaysia [Doctoral dissertation, UTAR].
6. Arpaci, I., & Kocadag Unver, T. (2020). Moderating role of gender in the relationship between big five personality traits and smartphone addiction. Psychiatric Quarterly, 91(2),577-585. [DOI:10.1007/s11126-020-09718-5] [PMID]
7. Balta, S., Emirtekin, E., Kircaburun, K., & Griffiths, M. D. (2020). Neuroticism, trait fear of missing out, and phubbing: The mediating role of state fear of missing out and problematic Instagram use. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18, 628-639. [DOI:10.1007/s11469-018-9959-8]
8. Barańczuk, U. (2019). The five-factor model of personality and emotion regulation: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences,139, 217-227. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.025]
9. Bian, M., & Leung, L. (2015). Linking loneliness, shyness, smartphone addiction symptoms, and patterns of smartphone use to social capital. Social science computer review, 33(1),61-79. [DOI:10.1177/0894439314528779]
10. Bianchi, A., & Phillips, J. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 8(1), 39-51. [DOI:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.39] [PMID]
11. Biglu, M. H., & Ghavami, M. (2016). Factors influencing dependence on mobile phone. Journal of Analytical Research in Clinical Medicine,4(3),158-162. [DOI:10.15171/jarcm.2016.026]
12. Billieux, J. (2012). Problematic use of the mobile phone: A literature review and a pathways model. Current Psychiatry Reviews, 8(4), 299-307. [DOI:10.2174/157340012803520522]
13. Billieux, J., Maurage, P., Lopez-Fernandez, O., Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Can disordered mobile phone use be considered a behavioral addiction? An update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future research. Current Addiction Reports, 2(2),156-162. [DOI:10.1007/s40429-015-0054-y]
14. Brand, M., Wegmann, E., Stark, R., Müller, A., Wölfling, K., Robbins, T. W., & Potenza, M. N. (2019). The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: Update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 104, 1-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.032] [PMID]
15. Carvalho, L. F., Sette, C. P., & Ferrari, B. L. (2018). Problematic smartphone use relationship with pathological personality traits: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 12(3). [DOI:10.5817/CP2018-3-5]
16. Chi, L. C., Tang, T. C., & Tang, E. (2022). The phubbing phenomenon: a cross-sectional study on the relationships among social media addiction, fear of missing out, personality traits, and phubbing behavior. Current Psychology,41(2),1112-1123. [DOI:10.1007/s12144-021-02468-y]
17. Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Measuring phone snubbing behavior: Development and validation of the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) and the Generic Scale of Being Phubbed (GSBP). Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 5-17. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.020]
18. Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). The effects of "phubbing" on social interaction. Journal of applied social psychology, 48(6), 304-316. [DOI:10.1111/jasp.12506]
19. Çikrikci, Ö., Griffiths, M. D., & Erzen, E. (2022). Testing the mediating role of phubbing in the relationship between the big five personality traits and satisfaction with life. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1-13. [DOI:10.1007/s11469-019-00115-z]
20. Cocoradă, E., Maican, C. I., Cazan, A. M., & Maican, M. A. (2018). Assessing the smartphone addiction risk and its associations with personality traits among adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 93, 345-354. [DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.08.006]
21. Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of personality disorders, 6(4), 343-359. [DOI:10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343]
22. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources (PAR). [DOI:10.1037/t07564-000]
23. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological assessment, 4(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.20 [DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5]
24. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives, 2, 51-87.
25. D'Arienzo, M. C., Boursier, V., & Griffiths, M. D. (2019). Addiction to social media and attachment styles: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17, 1094-1118. [DOI:10.1007/s11469-019-00082-5]
26. Ding, Y., Huang, H., Zhang, Y., Peng, Q., Yu, J., Lu, G., & Chen, C. (2022). Correlations between smartphone addiction and alexithymia, attachment style, and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971735] [PMID] []
27. Ehrenberg, A., Juckes, S., White, K. M., & Walsh, S. P. (2008). Personality and self-esteem as predictors of young people's technology use. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 11(6), 739-741. [DOI:10.1089/cpb.2008.0030] [PMID]
28. Eichenberg, C., Schott, M., & Schroiff, A. (2021). Problematic smartphone use-comparison of students with and without problematic smartphone use in light of personality. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 599241. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.599241] [PMID] []
29. Elhai, J. D., Dvorak, R. D., Levine, J. C., & Hall, B. J. (2017). Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. Journal of affective disorders, 207, 251-259. [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.030] [PMID]
30. Erdem, C., & Uzun, A. M. (2022). Smartphone addiction among undergraduates: Roles of personality traits and demographic factors. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(2), 579-597. [DOI:10.1007/s10758-020-09467-1]
31. Erzen, E., Odaci, H., & Yeniçeri, İ. (2021). Phubbing: Which personality traits are prone to phubbing? Social Science Computer Review, 39(1), 56-69. [DOI:10.1177/0894439319847415]
32. Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: The biosocial approach to personality. In J. Strelau & A. Angleitner (Eds.), Explorations in temperament: International perspectives on theory and measurement (pp. 87-103). Plenum Press.
33. Gao, L., Zhai, S., Xie, H., Liu, Q., Niu, G., & Zhou, Z. (2020). Big five personality traits and problematic mobile phone use: A meta-analytic review. Current Psychology, 1-18. [DOI:10.1007/s12144-020-00817-x]
34. Garousi Farshi, M. T., Mehryar A. H., & Ghazi Tabatabaei, M. (2001). Application of the N NEOP I-R test and analytic evaluation of its characteristic and factorial structure among Irainian university students. Journal of Humanities, 11(39), 173-198.
35. Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis 4th edition. Prentice Hall.
36. Griffiths, M. (2005). A 'components' model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance use, 10(4), 191-197. [DOI:10.1080/14659890500114359]
37. Hanson, N., & Buckworth, J. (2017). Personality characteristics of barefoot runners: openness and conscientiousness as the defining traits. Sport Sciences for Health, 13, 33-38. [DOI:10.1007/s11332-016-0311-z]
38. Hassan Esfahani, M., Khanjani, M., & Bazram, A. (2021). The factor Structure and psychometric properties of Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP). Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 12(46), 7-26.
39. Horwood, S., & Anglim, J. (2018). Personality and problematic smartphone use: A facet-level analysis using the Five Factor Model and HEXACO frameworks. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 349-359. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.013]
40. Hsiao, K. L. (2017). Compulsive mobile application usage and technostress: the role of personality traits. Online Information Review, 41(2), 272-295. [DOI:10.1108/OIR-03-2016-0091]
41. Hussain, Z., Griffiths, M. D., & Sheffield, D. (2017). An investigation into problematic smartphone use: The role of narcissism, anxiety, and personality factors. Journal of behavioral addictions, 6(3), 378-386. [DOI:10.1556/2006.6.2017.052] [PMID] []
42. Hussain, Z., & Pontes, H. M. (2018). Personality, internet addiction, and other technological addictions: A psychological examination of personality traits and technological addictions. In B. Bozoglan (Ed.), Psychological, social, and cultural aspects of Internet addiction (pp. 45-71). IGI Global. [DOI:10.4018/978-1-5225-3477-8.ch003]
43. Jani, D. (2014). Relating travel personality to Big Five Factors of personality. Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 62(4), 347-359.
44. Jiang, H. B., Huang, J. X., Zhang, B., Guo, Y., Sun, S. H., & Wang, C. (2018). The relationship between personality traits and cell phone dependence among college students: The mediating effect of emotional regulation self-efficacy. Modern Preventive Medicine, 45(14), 2588-2591.
45. Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Şahin, B. M., & Babadağ, B. (2015). Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. Journal of behavioral addictions, 4(2), 60-74. [DOI:10.1556/2006.4.2015.005] [PMID] []
46. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3. Baskı). Guilford.
47. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
48. Lee, M., Murphy, K., & Andrews, G. (2019). Using media while interacting face-to-face is associated with psychosocial well-being and personality traits. Psychological Reports, 122(3), 944-967. [DOI:10.1177/0033294118770357] [PMID]
49. Lei, L. Y. C., Ismail, M. A. A., Mohammad, J. A. M., & Yusoff, M. S. B. (2020). The relationship of smartphone addiction with psychological distress and neuroticism among university medical students. BMC psychology, 8, 1-9. [DOI:10.1186/s40359-020-00466-6] [PMID] []
50. Lim, E. H. Y., Liew, J. K., & Yap, J. S. (2019). Self-esteem and extraversion in predicting problematic smartphone use among Malaysian emerging adults [Doctoral dissertation, UTAR].
51. Liu, Y., Wang, X., Zhai, J., Luo, F., & Xin, T. (2023). The effect of neuroticism on problematic smartphone use: A mediation model of self-control for males and females. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 17(1), 1-15. [DOI:10.5817/CP2023-1-1]
52. Luria, G. (2018). The mediating role of smartphone addiction on the relationship between personality and young drivers' smartphone use while driving. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 59, 203-211. [DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.001]
53. Luyckx, K., Klimstra, T. A., Duriez, B., Van Petegem, S., & Beyers, W. (2013). Personal identity processes from adolescence through the late 20s: Age trends, functionality, and depressive symptoms. Social Development, 22(4), 701-721. [DOI:10.1111/sode.12027]
54. Magner, N., Welker, R. B., & Campbell, T. L. (1996). Testing a model of cognitive budgetary participation processes in a latent variable structural equation's framework. Accounting and Business Research, 27(1), 41-50. [DOI:10.1080/00014788.1996.9729530]
55. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(1), 81. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81] [PMID]
56. Newzoo (2021). Global Mobile Market Report. Available online at
57. Nikel, Ł., Kolańska-Stronka, M., & Krasa, P. (2024). Personality traits, internet addiction, and phubbing among teens: a mediation analysis. Behaviour & Information Technology. 1-14 [DOI:10.1080/0144929X.2024.2323096]
58. O'Dea, S. (2021). Number of smartphone users worldwide from 2016 to 2023. Statista.
59. Parmaksız, İ. (2021). Relationships between phubbing and the five factor personality traits. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 29(4), 32-42. [DOI:10.24106/kefdergi.795620]
60. Parus, M. S., Adu, A., & Keraf, M. A. (2021). Phubbing behavior and quality of friendship in Faculty of Public Health, Nusa Cendana University. Journal of Health and Behavioral Science, 3(1), 13-23. [DOI:10.35508/jhbs.v3i1.3031]
61. Rachman, A., Rusandi, M. A., & Setiawan, M. A. (2019). The effect of phubbing on students' academic procrastination. Jurnal Bimbingan danKonseling, 8(1), 1-5. [DOI:10.12928/psikopedagogia.v8i1.17895]
62. Sert, H., Üngören, Y., Pelin, M., & Horzum, M. B. (2023). Relationship between chronotypes, personality traits, and phubbing levels in university students. Biological Rhythm Research, 54(3), 322-333. [DOI:10.1080/09291016.2023.2169653]
63. Sevari, K. (2014). Construction and Validation of the Mobile Phone Addiction Questionnaire. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 15(4), 126-142.
64. Stachl, C., Hilbert, S., Au, J. Q., Buschek, D., De Luca, A., Bischl, B., ... & Bühner, M. (2017). Personality traits predict smartphone usage. European Journal of Personality, 31(6), 701-722. [DOI:10.1002/per.2113]
65. Sun, J., & Miller, C. H. (2023). Insecure Attachment Styles and Phubbing: The Mediating Role of Problematic Smartphone Use. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 12, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4059010 https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8810293 [DOI:10.1155/2023/4331787]
66. Sun, J., & Samp, J. A. (2021). 'Phubbing is happening to you': examining predictors and effects of phubbing behaviour in friendships. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(12), 2691-2704. [DOI:10.1080/0144929X.2021.1943711]
67. Talan, T., Doğan, Y., & Kalinkara, Y. (2024). Effects of smartphone addiction, social media addiction and fear of missing out on university students' phubbing: A structural equation model. Deviant Behavior, 45(1), 1-14. [DOI:10.1080/01639625.2023.2235870]
68. Tanhan, F., Özok, H. İ., Kaya, A., & Yıldırım, M. (2024). Mediating and moderating effects of cognitive flexibility in the relationship between social media addiction and phubbing. Current Psychology, 43(1), 192-203. [DOI:10.1007/s12144-023-04242-8] [PMID] []
69. Volungis, A. M., Kalpidou, M., Popores, C., & Joyce, M. (2020). Smartphone addiction and its relationship with indices of social-emotional distress and personality. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18, 1209-1225. [DOI:10.1007/s11469-019-00119-9]
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به روانشناسی معاصر، دوفصلنامه انجمن روانشناسی ایران می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق