Volume 19, Issue 1 (7-2024)                   bjcp 2024, 19(1): 89-102 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


1- faculty of literature and human sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.
2- Faculty of literature and humanities, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran. , dr.mehradadhajihasani@gmail.com
3- Faculty of literature and humanities, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.
Abstract:   (1562 Views)
Communicational and emotional styles play a crucial role in the quality of marital relationships. The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between love styles and humor styles with marital satisfaction. This research employed a quantitative, correlational design. The statistical population included married men and women in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province, from which 400 individuals were selected using a convenience sampling method. The research instruments were the ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Questionnaire (Olson, 1998), the Love Styles Questionnaire (Hendrick, 1986), and the Humor Styles Questionnaire (Martin, 2003). Results of the independent t-test revealed that men reported significantly higher marital satisfaction than women. Pearson correlation analysis showed that eros, storge, pragma, and agape love styles were positively and significantly associated with marital satisfaction in both genders, while ludus love style showed a significant relationship only in women. Regarding humor styles, only self-enhancing humor was positively associated with marital satisfaction in men. In contrast, in women, self-enhancing, aggressive, and self-defeating humor styles were negatively and significantly related to marital satisfaction. To explore the predictive role of the variables, a stepwise regression analysis was conducted. Gender, love styles, and humor styles were entered as predictor variables. The final model, in five steps, significantly predicted marital satisfaction, with eros, self-defeating humor, storge, pragma, and mania contributing meaningfully to the prediction. Altogether, the model accounted for 49% of the variance in marital satisfaction. These findings underscore the complexity of psychological and behavioral factors affecting marital satisfaction and highlight the importance of understanding such variables to enhance marital quality.
Article number: 7
Full-Text [PDF 435 kb]   (1 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/02/15 | Revised: 2025/07/25 | Accepted: 2025/08/31 | ePublished ahead of print: 2025/09/21 | Published: 2026/01/16

References
1. Abreu-Afonso, J., Ramos, M. M., Queiroz-Garcia, I., & Leal, I. (2022). How Couple's Relationship Lasts Over Time? A Model for Marital Satisfaction. Psychological reports, 125(3), 1601-1627. [DOI:10.1177/00332941211000651] [PMID] []
2. Acevedo B. P., Aron A. (2009). Does a long-term relationship kill romantic love? Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 59-65. [DOI:10.1037/a0014226]
3. Agus, M., Puddu, L., & Raffagnino, R. (2021). Exploring the Similarity of Partners' Love Styles and Their Relationships With Marital Satisfaction: A Dyadic Approach. Sage Open, 11(4). [DOI:10.1177/21582440211040785]
4. Ahadi, B., Mohammadi, A., & Karimi, M. (2012). Validation and psychometric properties of the ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Questionnaire in a sample of Iranian couples. Counseling Research, 8(30), 65-78. [In Persian]
5. Amato, P. R., & Keith, B. (1991). Parental divorce and adult well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 43-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353132
6. Ammerman, M. C. (2002). Gender differences in the use of humor in intimate relationships and marital adjustment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Peperdine University, USA.
7. Berscheid E. (2010). Love in the fourth dimension. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 1-25. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100318] [PMID]
8. Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 964-980. [DOI:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x]
9. Bressler, E. R., & Balshine, S. (2006). The influence of humor on desirability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(1), 29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.002]
10. Butzer, B., & Kuiper, N. A. (2008). Humor use in romantic relationships: The effects of relationship satisfaction and pleasant versus conflict situations. The Journal of Psychology, 142(3), 245-260. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.142.3.245-260 [DOI:10.3200/JRLP.142.3.245-260] [PMID]
11. Carstensen, L. L., Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotional behavior in long-term marriage. Psychology and Aging, 10(1), 140-149. [DOI:10.1037/0882-7974.10.1.140] [PMID]
12. Çelik, E. (2012). An investigation of married individuals' levels of sexual self-confidence in relation to sexual self-efficacy, marital life satisfaction, and sexual shyness [Doctoral dissertation]. Sakarya University, Sakarya.
13. Çetin, B. T. (2010). Prediction of marital satisfaction based on certain variables [Master's thesis, Ege University]. Ege Üniversites
14. Choi, E., &Jung,S.Y.(2021).Marital satisfaction and depressive symptoms among Koreancouples with young children: Dyadic autoregressive cross-lagged modeling. Family Relations, 70(5), 1384-1398. [DOI:10.1111/fare.12570]
15. Craig, R. J., & Olsen, R. E. (1995). 16 PF profiles and typologies for patients seen in marital therapy. Psychological Reports, 77(1), 187-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.77.1.187 [PMID]
16. de Koning, E., & Weiss, R. L. (2002). The relational humor inventory: functions of humor in close relationships. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 30(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1080/019261802753455615 [DOI:10.1080/019261802753455615]
17. Derebaşı, I. (2004). Evlilik doyumu ölçeğinin (MSI-R) madde cevap kuramına dayalı olarak psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi ve adaptasyon çalışması [Doktora tezi]. Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir.
18. Driver, J. L., & Gottman, J. M. (2004). Daily marital interactions and positive affect during marital conflict among newlywed couples. Family Process, 43(3), 301-314. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2004.00024.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2004.00024.x] [PMID]
19. Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in-context. In J. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 19-35). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. [DOI:10.1002/9780470773963.ch2]
20. Eckstein, D., Junkins, E., & McBrien, R. (2003). Ha, ha, ha: Improving couple and family healthy humor (healthy humor quotient). The Family Journal, 11(3), 301-305. doi: 10.1177/1066480703252869 [DOI:10.1177/1066480703252869]
21. Eskandari, N., Simbar, M., Vedadhir, A. A., Baghestani, A. R., & Momenyan, S. (2019). Related factors to paternal adaptation: A cross-sectional study for first-time fathers. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 24(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_144_17 [DOI:10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_144_ 17] [PMID] []
22. Fan, J., Ren, L., & Li, X. (2020). Contributions of child temperament and marital quality to coparenting among Chinese families. Children and Youth Services Review, 108(2), 104610. [DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104610]
23. Fehr B., Harasymchuk C., Sprecher S. (2014). Compassionate love in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31(5), 575-600. [DOI:10.1177/0265407514533768]
24. Gana K., Saada Y., Untas A. (2013). Effects of love styles on marital satisfaction in heterosexual couples: A dyadic approach. Marriage & Family Review, 49(8), 754-772. [DOI:10.1080/01494929.2013.834025]
25. Goodboy A. K., Myers S. A. (2010). Relational quality indicators and love styles as predictors of negative relational maintenance behaviors in romantic relationships. Communication Reports, 23(2), 65-78. [DOI:10.1080/08934215.2010.511397]
26. Gordon, K. C., Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., Burnett, C. K., & Rankin, L. A. (1999). The interaction between marital standards and communication patterns: How does it contribute to marital adjustment? Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25, 211-223. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1999.tb01123.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1999.tb01123.x] [PMID]
27. Hall, S. S. (2006). Marital meaning: Exploring young adults' belief systems about marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 27(10), 1437-1458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X06290036 [DOI:10.1177/ 0192513X06290036]
28. Hammock G., Richardson D. S. (2011). Love attitudes and relationship experience. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(5), 608-624. [DOI:10.1080/00224545.2010.522618] [PMID]
29. Heintz, S., & Ruch, W. (2015). An examination of the convergence between the conceptualization and the measurement of humor styles: A study of the construct validity of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 28(4), 611-633. [DOI:10.1515/humor-2015-0095]
30. Heintz, S., & Ruch, W. (2016). Reply to Martin (2015): Why our conclusions hold. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 29(1), 125129. [DOI:10.1515/humor-2015-0132]
31. Helgeson, V. (1994). Relation of agency and comm:union: to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 416-428. [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.412]
32. Hendrick C., Hendrick S. S., Dicke A. (1998). The love attitudes scale: Short form. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(2), 147-159. [DOI:10.1177/0265407598152001]
33. Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392-402. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.392]
34. Hendrix, H., & Hunt, H. L. (2004). Receiving love: Transform your relationship by letting yourself be loved. Simon and Schuster.
35. Hendrix, R. W., Hatfull, G. F., & Smith, M. C. (2003). Bacteriophages with tails: chasing their origins and evolution. Research in microbiology, 154(4), 253-257. [DOI:10.1016/S0923-2508(03)00068-8] [PMID]
36. Hoesni S. M., Subhi N., Alavi K., Wan Azreena W. J. (2013). Exploring love and marital satisfaction among married Malay males. Pertanika Journals of Social Sciences and Humanities, 21, 59-68 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287077331
37. Honeycutt, J. M., & Brown, R. (1998). Did you hear the one about?: Typological and spousal differences in the planning of jokes and sense of humor in marriage. Communication Quarterly, 46(3), 342-352. doi: 10.1080/01463379809370106 [DOI:10.1080/01463379809370106]
38. Jackson, J. B., Miller, R. B., Oka, M., & Henry, R. G. (2014). Gender differences in marital satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(1), 105-129. [DOI:10.1111/jomf.12077]
39. Johari, M. (2004). Humour and marital quality: Is humour style associated with marital success?. Unpublished [Master Dissertation. Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada]
40. Kazarian, S. S., & Martin, R. A. (2006). Humor styles, culture-related personality, well-being, and family adjustment among Armenians in Lebanon. Humor, 9(4): 405-423. doi: 10.1515/HUMOR.2006.020 [DOI:10.1515/HUMOR.2006.020]
41. Kimberly C., Werner-Wilson R. (2013). From John Lee to John Gottman: Recognizing intra- and interpersonal differences to promote marital satisfaction. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 1(2), 32-46 [DOI:10.54718/NNHN5184]
42. Lavner, J. A., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2016). Does couples' communication predict marital satisfaction, or does marital satisfaction predict communication? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 78(3), 680-694. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12301 [DOI:10.1111/jomf. 12301] [PMID] []
43. Markman, H. J. (1992). Marital and family psychology: Burning issues. Journal of Family Psychology, 5(3-4), 264-275. [DOI:10.1037/0893-3200.5.3-4.264]
44. Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48-75. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2 [DOI:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2]
45. Narciso, I., & Costa, M. E. (1996). Satisfied but not perfect loves. Cadernos de Consulta Psicológica, 12, 115-130.
46. Neto F., Pinto M. C. (2015). Satisfaction with Love Life Across the Adult Life Span. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 10(2), 289-304. [DOI:10.1007/s11482-014-9314-6]
47. Olson, D. H., Fournier, D. G., & Druckman, J. M. (1987). Counselor's manual for PREPARE/ENRICH (Rev. ed.). Minneapolis, MN: PREPARE/ENRICH, Inc.
48. Olson, D. H., McCubbin, H. I., Barnes, H. L., Larsen, A. S., Muxen, M. J., & Wilson, M. A. (1983). Families: What makes them work. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
49. Pourmohseni Kaloori, F. (2016). Gender differences in attachment styles and personality traits in predicting love styles among students. Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences Research, 6(1), 17-32. [In Persian] [DOI:10.22108/cbs.2016.20751.]
50. Reinhold, S. (2010). Reassessing the link between premarital cohabitation and marital instability. Demography, 47, 719-733. [DOI:10.1353/dem.0.0122] [PMID] []
51. Saroglou, V., Lacour, C., & Demeure, M. E. (2010). Bad humor, bad marriage: Humor styles in divorced and married couples. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 6(3), 94-121. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v6i3.210 [DOI:10.5964/ejop.v6i3.210]
52. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
53. Taghavi Dinani, P., Samkhaniyan, E., Hamidi, M., & Arkiyan, F. (2014). Study on the relationship between love attitudes and marital satisfaction among married women. European online journal of natural and social sciences, 3(3), pp-468 https://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/778
54. Umberson, D., Williams, K., Powers, D. A., Liu, H., & Needham, B. (2006). You make me sick: Marital quality and health over the life course. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47(1), 1-16. [DOI:10.1177/002214650604700101] [PMID] []
55. Üncü, S. (2007). The relationship between emotional intelligence and marital satisfaction [Master's thesis, Ankara University]. Ankara Üniversitesi.
56. Vedes A., Hilpert P., Nussbeck F. W., Randall A. K., Bodenmann G., Lind W. R. (2016). Love styles, coping, and relationship satisfaction: A dyadic approach. Personal Relationships, 23(1), 84-97. [DOI:10.1111/pere.12112]
57. Wais, P. C. L., Liria, M. C. L., & Medina, E. L. M. (2017). Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de actitudes sobre el amor (LAS) en universitarios peruanos. Acta colombiana de Psicología, 20(2), 270-281. [DOI:10.14718/ACP.2017.20.2.13]
58. Williamson, I., & Gonzales, M. H. (2007). The Subjective Experience of forgiveness: Positive construals of the forgiveness experience. Journal of Social and Clinical and Psychology, 26(4), 407-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2007.26.4.407 [DOI:10.1521/jscp.2007.26.4.407]
59. Windsor, T. D., & Butterworth, P. (2010). Supportive, aversive, ambivalent, and indifferent partner evaluations in midlife and young-old adulthood. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 65(3), 287-295. [DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbq016] [PMID]
60. Yoo, G., & Joo, S. (2022). Love for a marriage story: the association between love and marital satisfaction in middle adulthood. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 31(6), 1570-1581. [DOI:10.1007/s10826-021-02055-6]
61. Zare, H., Kamali Zarch, M., & Rezaei-Nasab, F. (2009). Humor styles and the five personality traits. Developmental Psychology: Iranian Psychologists, 6(22), 119-128. [In Persian, 1388]. https://journals.iau.ir/article_512325.html

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.